Utah is getting really bizarre:
As of this morning, the state of Utah has filed a reply brief to the plaintiff's brief opposing a stay. I'm not going to comment on it -- it's pretty much a mess, which, as Joe Jervis right points out, amounts to "Oh, yes it is, so there!" starting by largely ignoring the 14th Amendment issues, and relying heavily on Baker v. Nelson, a case from 1972 which most courts consider to have been superseded.
Via Joe.My.God.
Update: The full Supreme Court has issued a stay on Judge Shelby's order.
I don't doubt that it offered no reasoning. I doubt that any reasoning would have stood up to scrutiny -- even rational basis.
Update II: And right on cue, here's Brian Brown of NOM, hysterical rhetoric and all, applauding a Supreme Court decision which says, essentially, nothing. (And getting all the facts of the matter wrong, where he bothers with them at all.) (I really had a hard time deciding whether to post this here or in the previous post -- Brown is starting to fit right in with the crazies.)
As of this morning, the state of Utah has filed a reply brief to the plaintiff's brief opposing a stay. I'm not going to comment on it -- it's pretty much a mess, which, as Joe Jervis right points out, amounts to "Oh, yes it is, so there!" starting by largely ignoring the 14th Amendment issues, and relying heavily on Baker v. Nelson, a case from 1972 which most courts consider to have been superseded.
Via Joe.My.God.
Update: The full Supreme Court has issued a stay on Judge Shelby's order.
The Supreme Court on Monday blocked further same-sex marriages in Utah while state officials appeal a decision allowing such unions.
The terse order, from the full court, issued a stay “pending final disposition” of an appeal to the federal appeals court in Denver. It offered no reasoning.
I don't doubt that it offered no reasoning. I doubt that any reasoning would have stood up to scrutiny -- even rational basis.
Update II: And right on cue, here's Brian Brown of NOM, hysterical rhetoric and all, applauding a Supreme Court decision which says, essentially, nothing. (And getting all the facts of the matter wrong, where he bothers with them at all.) (I really had a hard time deciding whether to post this here or in the previous post -- Brown is starting to fit right in with the crazies.)
No comments:
Post a Comment