This, from Mahablog:
I think she's right, in broad terms. There are Democratic officials who stand for something -- a few -- but the party itself, and most of its office-holders, don't.
See this post about the difference between FDR liberals and neoliberals.
I’m old enough to remember when Harry Truman and Eleanor Roosevelt were still alive and still influential in party politics. I was in middle school during the Kennedy Administration. For all his flaws regarding Vietnam, Lyndon Johnson initiated genuinely progressive domestic programs. I was in high school when Bobby Kennedy ran for President and was assassinated. I cast my first vote for POTUS for George McGovern. So that’s the Democratic Party I remember — flawed and messy, but still a vehicle for doing the right thing, at least part of the time.
But that party died a quiet death some time back. I’m not sure that other people my age realize this. The Democratic Party now is closer to where the Republicans were during the Nixon Administration than they are to being the party of Truman, Kennedy or even LBJ.
But at least the Nixon Republicans sort of stood for something. You knew where they were coming from. The current party Democratic Party stands for nothing.
I think she's right, in broad terms. There are Democratic officials who stand for something -- a few -- but the party itself, and most of its office-holders, don't.
See this post about the difference between FDR liberals and neoliberals.
No comments:
Post a Comment