I thought I had posted on Laura Ingraham insulting David Hogg via Twitter, but apparently I didn't. Digby has a must-read that examines not only Ingraham but the right wing in general in their attacks on the activist Parkland survivors:
Digby then goes on to detail some of the attacks right-wing nutters have made on the Parkland kids. It's pretty disgusting.
Oh,and as for Ingraham:
Hogg called for a boycott, and her advertisers responded, which led Ingraham to an "apology".
"In the spirit of Holy Week"? If this woman was a follower of Jesus, she never would have attacked the kid to begin with.
Oh, look -- suddenly she's open to a "productive discussion". Yeah, right.
At any rate, it didn't work: her advertisers have continued to bail, and there are rumors that Fox is ready to dump her. (Lest you think that this indicates some sort of standard or integrity on the part of Fox, well, no: think lost revenues.)
And Hogg isn't buying it:
All I can say is, "Keep up the good work!"
Sorry for the link dump, but my connection is worse than usual and Firefox is fighting me every inch of the way.
Laura Ingraham did her thing. Again:
Via Vox:
Many conservatives have naturally been critical of the political and policy stances of the Parkland survivors, as would be expected given that they generally oppose gun control.
But some, like Ingraham, have gone further than that — attacking Parkland students, who are still kids, for unrelated and often personal aspects of their lives. Just consider the fact that Ingraham could post an article about how Hogg was rejected from four universities. Why did the Daily Wire, conservative pundit Ben Shapiro’s outlet, find that news worth covering in the first place, besides the schadenfreude the outlet knew it would provide conservative readers who don’t like Hogg and his movement?
It’s not unusual for politics to get personal. But it’s particularly glaring when prominent pundits and even lawmakers are going after teenagers in such a personal way.
Digby then goes on to detail some of the attacks right-wing nutters have made on the Parkland kids. It's pretty disgusting.
Oh,and as for Ingraham:
Hogg called for a boycott, and her advertisers responded, which led Ingraham to an "apology".
Any student should be proud of a 4.2 GPA —incl. @DavidHogg111. On reflection, in the spirit of Holy Week, I apologize for any upset or hurt my tweet caused him or any of the brave victims of Parkland. For the record, I believe my show was the first to feature David...(1/2)— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) March 29, 2018
"In the spirit of Holy Week"? If this woman was a follower of Jesus, she never would have attacked the kid to begin with.
... immediately after that horrific shooting and even noted how "poised" he was given the tragedy. As always, he’s welcome to return to the show anytime for a productive discussion. WATCH: https://t.co/5wcd00wWpd (2/2)— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) March 29, 2018
Oh, look -- suddenly she's open to a "productive discussion". Yeah, right.
At any rate, it didn't work: her advertisers have continued to bail, and there are rumors that Fox is ready to dump her. (Lest you think that this indicates some sort of standard or integrity on the part of Fox, well, no: think lost revenues.)
And Hogg isn't buying it:
Parkland activist David Hogg was interviewed this morning by CNN’s Alison Camerota. Via Mediaite:
Camerota pointed out that Ingraham is a conservative talk show host, and isn’t objective, before noting that she apologized for her tweet poking fun at Hogg. “Do you accept her apology?”
“No,” Hogg said. “She’s only apologizing after a third of her advertisers pulled out. I think it’s wrong. And I think if she really wants to do something she could cover inner-city violence and the real issues that we have in America,” he continued. “I know she is a talk show host, but as such she also has a responsibility to show both sides of the story.”
All I can say is, "Keep up the good work!"
Sorry for the link dump, but my connection is worse than usual and Firefox is fighting me every inch of the way.
No comments:
Post a Comment