I'm sure you're as heartily sick of the Bundy clan's latest adventure in armed insurrection as I am. The only redeeming feature is that it's kicked Donald Trump off the headlines for a couple of days.
Reading through some of the coverage, it occurs to me that the right wing is, quite correctly, seeing this little episode as toxic: these guys look like the fools they are, at least to a national audience, and the powers that be in the Republican party are very well aware of the optics.
Just one indicator: Megyn Kelly interviewed Ammon Bundy and wasn't really giving him a pass:
After Bundy defended his decision to lead a small militia to take over a federal wildlife refuge in Oregon, Kelly challenged him.
This is Fox News, where the likes of Tony Perkins regularly get tongue baths from the likes of Megyn Kelly. (And you're probably protesting that Perkins is a different order than the Bundys. Well, yes: the Bundys are honest.)
Even more revealing is this:
These were people who were falling all over themselves to support Kim Davis, another right-wing law breaker.
And from the moderate wing:
So far, I haven't seen a reaction from the Donald.
Small indicators, but they're there.
Reading through some of the coverage, it occurs to me that the right wing is, quite correctly, seeing this little episode as toxic: these guys look like the fools they are, at least to a national audience, and the powers that be in the Republican party are very well aware of the optics.
Just one indicator: Megyn Kelly interviewed Ammon Bundy and wasn't really giving him a pass:
After Bundy defended his decision to lead a small militia to take over a federal wildlife refuge in Oregon, Kelly challenged him.
"You know the argument on the other side, which is, these ranchers — whom you support but are not directly involved — had their day in court. And they were found guilty, and it went all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court, which denied their appeal. Isn’t that the way it’s supposed to work in our country when it comes to the rule of law?" she asked.
"Yeah, well let me ask you — and I’m sure you know the answer, but who was the plaintiff?" Bundy asked in response.
After a pause, Kelly told Bundy to "keep going."
And when Bundy asked the same question again, Kelly took another brief pause.
"I’m waiting for you to make your point. Generally I don’t answer the questions on my show; I ask them," she said.
This is Fox News, where the likes of Tony Perkins regularly get tongue baths from the likes of Megyn Kelly. (And you're probably protesting that Perkins is a different order than the Bundys. Well, yes: the Bundys are honest.)
Even more revealing is this:
Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz on Monday called for armed protesters who occupied a federal building in Oregon to "stand down peaceably."And from Marco Rubio:
"Every one of us has a constitutional right to protest, to speak our minds," Cruz told reporters in Iowa. "But we don't have a constitutional right to use force and violence and to threaten force and violence against others. So it is our hope that the protesters there will stand down peaceably, that there will not be a violent confrontation."
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio also addressed the issue Monday, telling an Iowa radio station "you cannot be lawless."
Rubio said during an interview with KBUR that he agrees "that there is too much federal control over land especially out in the western part of the United States."
"We should fix it, but no one should be doing it in a way that's outside the law," he added.
These were people who were falling all over themselves to support Kim Davis, another right-wing law breaker.
And from the moderate wing:
John Weaver, a senior aide for GOP candidate John Kasich, said in a tweet: "I know a good federal compound for Bundy and his gang: a U.S. penitentiary."
So far, I haven't seen a reaction from the Donald.
Small indicators, but they're there.
No comments:
Post a Comment